🥇 1. A-Leads.co

Score: 5.0/5 ⭐ Quick Reason: Pay-per-verified contact data with real-time enrichment, AI-driven intent signals, mobile numbers, and CRM-ready delivery.

Why A-Leads is #1 B2B Contact Data Platform in 2025

A-Leads redefines B2B contact data by cutting out fluff and charging only for what’s real. Built for GTM teams that need accuracy, speed, and scale, A-Leads delivers triple-verified emails, phone numbers (including mobile), LinkedIn URLs, job change alerts, and AI-powered buying intent — all updated in real time.

Unlike traditional data platforms, there’s no annual lock-in, no inflated per-seat licenses, and no outdated contacts cluttering your workflows. Just ready-to-close contacts, enriched live and delivered into your CRM or sales engagement platform.

Whether you're an SDR, RevOps leader, or founder doing outbound solo, A-Leads powers your pipeline with unmatched data precision.

🔑 Key Features

• ✅ Real-Time Enrichment: Verify contacts at the moment of export — not in monthly batches.
• ✅ 99% Deliverability Guarantee: No bounces, no stale data — pay only when it works.
• ✅ Direct Dials + Mobile Numbers: Even for VP and C-level targets.
• ✅ AI Signals: See job changes, hiring spikes, tech stack adoption, and more.
• ✅ CRM Integrations: Push to HubSpot, Salesforce, Smartlead, Outreach, and more.
• ✅ Data Privacy First: Never resold. GDPR + CCPA compliant.
• ✅ Credit Rollover: Use what you need, when you need it — with no pressure.

💸 Transparent Pricing

• Ignite – $60/month → 5,000 credits
• Boost – $99/month → 12,000 credits
• Power – $199/month → 30,000 credits
• Enterprise – Custom plans + API access + DFY GTM workflows

🔻 Cons

• ❌ Doesn’t send emails — built to pair with tools like Instantly, Smartlead, Clay, etc.
• ❌ No native dialer — but integrates with phone/SMS tools.

🧠 A-Leads in Action

• Used by RevOps teams to auto-fill CRMs with verified leads
• Powers outbound for hundreds of SaaS sales teams
• Works as the data backbone in cold email workflows
• Replaces ZoomInfo, Apollo, UpLead, Lusha, and Cognism in one stack

2. ZoomInfo

Score: 4.3/5 ⭐ Quick Reason: Massive B2B database with firmographics, technographics, and intent data — but rigid contracts, inconsistent data quality, and outdated UX hold it back.

Why ZoomInfo Made the List

ZoomInfo remains one of the most well-known names in the B2B data world. With 130M+ contacts, a robust enrichment ecosystem, and integrations with major CRMs and MAPs, it’s a staple for enterprise sales and marketing teams who value scale and breadth.

It offers advanced filters, Bombora-powered intent signals, technographics, and its own engagement tools (Engage, WebSights, and Chat). It’s used heavily by large revenue teams that need territory coverage across global markets.

But ZoomInfo’s strengths come at a cost: 5-figure annual contracts, complex onboarding, and no guarantee that the data you pull is valid or deliverable. You’re paying for access — not outcomes.

🔑 Core Features

• ✅ 130M+ Contact Records with job titles, seniority, org charts, and more
• ✅ Intent Signals via Bombora, Scoops, and WebSights
• ✅ Technographics & Firmographics — filter by software stack, employee size, and revenue
• ✅ CRM & MAP Integrations — Salesforce, Marketo, HubSpot, Outreach
• ✅ Engagement Tools — Run outbound campaigns directly inside ZoomInfo
• ✅ Data Enrichment & Web Visitor Reveal options included in higher tiers

🔻 Cons

• 🚫 Expensive — base plans start at $15K+/year and often go beyond $30K
• 🚫 Locked-In Contracts — no trials, no refunds, annual commitment only
• 🚫 Data Decay Issues — bounce rates of 10–25% reported in some verticals
• 🚫 Outdated UX — interface is clunky compared to modern platforms
• 🚫 Pushy Upselling — many users report difficulty canceling or downgrading
• 🚫 No “pay-per-valid” model — you’re billed whether the data works or not

📌 ZoomInfo in Action

• Used by enterprise sales teams covering large territories
• Powers RevOps enrichment workflows across 1,000+ employee orgs
• Often bundled with internal sales engagement tools
• Heavily adopted in B2B SaaS, IT, and financial services — but less agile than modern GTM stacks

🧠 Why A-Leads Wins for Most Teams

A-Leads was built to deliver clean, verified contact data on demand — not sell you access to a static database. Where ZoomInfo makes you pay $15K+ for thousands of unverified records, A-Leads lets you pay only for what’s verified and usable.

• No contracts
• No bounces
• Real-time AI signals
• Mobile numbers included
• All CRM-ready with click-to-sync

If you’re scaling a lean sales team, ZoomInfo is overkill. If you want flexibility, accuracy, and ROI, A-Leads is the better choice.

3. Apollo.io

Score: 4.2/5 ⭐ Quick Reason: An all-in-one B2B data + outreach tool popular with startups, but lacks verification quality and CRM-ready accuracy at scale.

Why Apollo.io Made the List

Apollo has grown fast as a budget-friendly platform combining a large B2B contact database with built-in cold email and dialer tools. It's one of the few platforms where you can find leads, sequence them, and reach out — all inside one tool. For early-stage sales teams and SDRs who want to get started quickly, it’s a strong pick.

Apollo’s 275M+ contact database is impressive on paper — but most of that volume lacks real-time verification. Bounce rates are especially high with catch-all domains, and while its Chrome extension is great for grabbing contacts on LinkedIn, serious GTM teams outgrow it quickly when accuracy, enrichment depth, or CRM precision becomes important.

🔑 Core Features

• ✅ 275M+ Contacts searchable by title, revenue, industry, and more
• ✅ Built-In Email Sequencer + Dialer — launch cold outreach directly
• ✅ Chrome Extension for LinkedIn lead grabbing
• ✅ Gmail, Outlook & CRM Sync (Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive)
• ✅ Engagement Tracking — email opens, clicks, replies
• ✅ Freemium Plan — basic data access with daily limits

🔻 Cons

• 🚫 Data often unverified or stale — especially outside U.S. and on SMBs
• 🚫 No real-time validation — bounce risk is high
• 🚫 No mobile numbers on most plans
• 🚫 Strict daily send caps on free and mid-tier plans (100–200 emails/day)
• 🚫 No intent signals or job change filters
• 🚫 Campaigns bog down on large-scale usage
• 🚫 You still pay for invalid data — no refunds for bounces or errors

📌 Apollo in Action

• Popular with early-stage SaaS teams testing outbound
• Useful for fast outbound testing and SDR onboarding
• Strong for low-volume sequences, not high-scale intent-based GTM
• Commonly paired with Clay or A-Leads once scale or precision becomes critical

🧠 Why A-Leads Wins at Scale

Apollo gives you speed and volume — but not certainty. A-Leads gives you verified leads in real time, with 99% deliverability, mobile numbers, intent filters, job change data, and click-to-CRM syncing.

You don’t have to manage warm-up tools, bounce cleanup, or dead emails. You just export, engage, and close. And you only pay for valid data — never a guess.

📞 Get 50 Verified Leads Instantly → a-leads.co

4. Lusha

Score: 4.0/5 ⭐ Quick Reason: Great for quick contact lookups and direct dials — but limited enrichment, static data, and pricey plans make it unsuited for scale.

Why Lusha Made the List

Lusha gained popularity with sales reps for its fast, no-fuss Chrome extension that grabs emails and phone numbers directly from LinkedIn. It’s a solid choice for 1:1 contact research or quick verification during manual prospecting.

Its interface is simple, and the browser plugin is smooth — making it ideal for SDRs who source leads while browsing. The platform also offers basic list enrichment and CRM integrations, but its capabilities stop there.

Where Lusha struggles is scale: no real-time validation, limited filtering, no technographics or intent signals, and minimal mobile number coverage. For growing GTM teams, the lack of enrichment depth and pricing creep make it a tough fit.

🔑 Core Features

• ✅ Chrome Extension — grab contact info from LinkedIn and websites
• ✅ Direct Dial Finder — strong U.S./EMEA phone coverage
• ✅ Basic Bulk Enrichment — upload lists for enrichment (with limits)
• ✅ CRM Integrations — connects with Salesforce, HubSpot, Outreach
• ✅ Team Workspace — shared credit pools and user permissions

🔻 Cons

• 🚫 No real-time data verification — bounce rates can be high
• 🚫 Low monthly credit limits unless on enterprise-tier plans
• 🚫 No firmographics, intent, or job change filters
• 🚫 No technographics or account signals
• 🚫 Pricey vs value — $3K+ plans for very limited usage
• 🚫 Not campaign-friendly — slow to use at volume

📌 Lusha in Action

• Best for SDRs doing 1:1 LinkedIn scraping
• Often used as a secondary contact checker
• Used by small teams, VAs, and freelancers — not RevOps or GTM teams
• Supplemented by A-Leads, Apollo, or Clay in serious outbound orgs

🧠 Why A-Leads Wins (Across Every Dimension)

Lusha is fast — but shallow. It’s a helpful browser plugin, not a full pipeline engine.

By contrast, A-Leads delivers:

• ✅ Verified emails + mobile numbers in real time
• ✅ Intent signals, job changes, and hiring patterns
• ✅ CRM-ready data synced in one click
• ✅ Technographics, revenue filters, and AI-based scoring
• ✅ 99% deliverability with pay-per-valid-lead billing

You don’t just “look up” contacts. You launch GTM with data that works.

📞 Get 50 Verified Leads Free → a-leads.co

5. Cognism

Score: 4.1/5 ⭐ Quick Reason: GDPR-strong with verified phone data for EMEA — but global coverage and pricing model limit its reach for most GTM teams.

Why Cognism Made the List

Cognism shines in GDPR-regulated markets. It’s one of the few platforms built specifically with European compliance at the core — a huge win for UK- and DACH-based outbound teams needing legally sourced data.

Its Diamond Data™ system combines AI and human verification to deliver accurate direct dials, and its partnerships with Bombora bring some buying intent signals into the mix.

But Cognism’s value drops outside Europe. U.S., LATAM, and APAC coverage is thin, pricing starts at enterprise-level commitments, and there’s no flexibility for smaller or faster-moving teams. The platform doesn’t support real-time export validation — meaning your emails or numbers can still bounce, even after paying.

🔑 Core Features

• 📞 Direct Dial Database — strong coverage for UK and EU numbers
• 🧠 Diamond Data™ — human + AI contact verification layer
• 🧩 Chrome Extension — enrich contacts across LinkedIn and websites
• 📊 Intent Signals — via Bombora for account-level targeting
• 🔄 CRM Integrations — Salesforce, HubSpot, Outreach, Salesloft
• 🌍 Global Data — available, but often lower quality than EMEA data

🔻 Cons

• 🚫 Expensive — $10K–$25K+/yr, billed upfront
• 🚫 Annual contracts only — no pay-as-you-go flexibility
• 🚫 No real-time validation on export
• 🚫 Weak U.S. and APAC data for outbound
• 🚫 No AI-driven job change, hiring, or buyer signals
• 🚫 No pay-per-lead model — you pay regardless of bounce rate

📌 Cognism in Action

• Used by compliance-heavy orgs (e.g. FinTech, HealthTech) in the EU
• Popular in enterprise ABM programs focused on phone outreach
• Rarely used as a standalone solution for global teams
• Frequently layered with Clay, A-Leads, or Outreach for automation

🧠 Why A-Leads Wins (Even in Europe)

Cognism is a compliance-first dialer. But modern sales teams need flexible, real-time, AI-validated data — without the enterprise tax.

A-Leads provides:

• ✅ Verified contact data globally — EMEA, U.S., APAC, LATAM
• ✅ Mobile numbers + job change + hiring signal enrichment
• ✅ Real-time data validation at export
• ✅ Pay-per-valid-lead billing — no upfront contracts
• ✅ CRM sync in one click (Salesforce, HubSpot, Clay, Smartlead)

Compliance? ✔️ Accuracy? ✔️ Flexibility? 🔥

📞 Try A-Leads Free Now → a-leads.co

6. Lead411

Score: 4.0/5 ⭐ Quick Reason: Solid job change alerts and direct dial coverage — but lacks real-time enrichment, buyer signals, and flexible usage models.

Why Lead411 Made the List

Lead411 is a niche favorite for U.S.-based mid-market teams that rely on outbound calls and sales triggers. It combines job change alerts, company growth signals, and verified phone numbers — making it valuable for industries like staffing, telecom, or field sales.

Its intent-based filtering and affordable pricing make it attractive for small GTM teams, and it integrates with CRMs like Salesforce and HubSpot.

But Lead411 falls short when it comes to real-time AI enrichment, global accuracy, or the kind of granular, signal-rich filtering that modern SDR workflows demand. You pay for access, not results — and bounce rates or missing phone numbers are your problem.

🔑 Core Features

• 📈 Job Change Triggers — alerts for promotions, new roles, company switches
• 📞 Verified Direct Dials — strong U.S. phone number coverage
• 📊 Intent-Based Filtering — Bombora-powered signals (on Pro+ plans)
• 🔍 Prospecting Filters — sort by job title, industry, revenue, etc.
• 🔄 CRM Integration — connects to Salesforce, HubSpot
• 🧾 Simple UI — list building and exports are quick to learn

🔻 Cons

• 🚫 No real-time validation at export — bounce risks remain
• 🚫 Data freshness depends on batch updates, not live sync
• 🚫 No technographics, job signals, or hiring filters
• 🚫 Limited mobile number coverage
• 🚫 No pay-per-verified-contact model
• 🚫 Outdated UI for modern sales workflows

📌 Lead411 in Action

• Popular with recruiters, SMB field sales, regional account teams
• Often paired with VOIP dialers and local-market sales workflows
• Strong for phone-first motion in the U.S. — but weak globally
• Not designed for AI-based scoring, enrichment, or modern GTM stacks

🧠 Why A-Leads Outperforms Lead411

Lead411 is great — if you only need phone numbers and job triggers in the U.S. But that’s a narrow use case. A-Leads powers global growth motions, not just call lists.

A-Leads delivers:

• ✅ Real-time, AI-verified contact data at export
• ✅ Global mobile number coverage — not just office lines
• ✅ Enrichment filters: job changes, hiring trends, funding, intent, tech stack
• ✅ 99% deliverability with CRM-ready fields
• ✅ Pay-per-valid-lead model — no risk, no waste
• ✅ CRM, SEP, and data tool integrations in one click

The difference? Lead411 gives you names to call. A-Leads gives you pipeline-ready prospects — powered by AI, intent, and trust.

📞 Get 50 Verified Credits Free → a-leads.co

7. Clearbit

Score: 3.9/5 ⭐ Quick Reason: Great for inbound lead enrichment and web personalization — but lacks outbound data, contact access, or pay-per-performance pricing.

Why Clearbit Made the List

Clearbit is a go-to solution for B2B marketers and RevOps teams looking to enrich inbound form data, personalize websites, and deanonymize visitor traffic. It excels in firmographic enrichment — like company size, industry, or tech stack — pulled from domains, IPs, and email domains.

If you're focused on website conversion or ABM personalization, Clearbit can turn anonymous sessions into MQLs and segment users based on business attributes.

But its utility ends there. Clearbit doesn’t provide emails, phone numbers, or outbound contact lists. It’s not built for prospecting or SDR workflows. And at $10K+/year with no pay-per-lead logic, ROI can be questionable unless you’re a mature, high-volume inbound machine.

🔑 Core Features

• 🌐 Reveal & Deanonymization — map IPs and email domains to companies
• 🧠 Form Enrichment — enriches demo/signup forms in real-time
• 🧩 Firmographic Data — company size, revenue, location, tech stack
• 🔁 CRM/CDP Sync — works with HubSpot, Segment, Salesforce, Marketo
• 🧬 Web Personalization Support — show dynamic content based on firmographics
• 💡 Ideal Use Cases — ABM, inbound scoring, web personalization

🔻 Cons

• 🚫 No emails or phone numbers — zero contact-level outbound utility
• 🚫 Not usable for prospecting, cold outreach, or list building
• 🚫 Locked into annual contracts — starting around $10K/year
• 🚫 No verification of contact data — because it doesn’t provide any
• 🚫 No mobile numbers, job signals, hiring triggers, or technographics
• 🚫 Static enrichment — no real-time prospect signal detection

📌 Clearbit in Action

• Loved by SaaS RevOps for auto-enriching inbound demo forms
• Paired with personalization tools like Mutiny or Drift
• Often used to segment traffic or score MQLs by company type
• Excellent for inbound workflows — unusable for outbound motion

🧠 Why A-Leads Beats Clearbit for Sales Teams

Clearbit enriches what’s already there. A-Leads finds, verifies, and delivers contacts that aren’t yet in your funnel — with verified email, mobile, LinkedIn, and AI job signals.

A-Leads offers:

• ✅ Verified B2B contact data (email, mobile, LinkedIn)
• ✅ AI enrichment for job changes, intent, hiring, funding, tech stack
• ✅ Outbound-ready leads — export and engage instantly
• ✅ No bloated contracts — just pay for valid leads
• ✅ CRM + sales tool integrations across the full GTM stack
• ✅ Real-time scoring, enrichment, and deduplication at export

💡 Use Clearbit if you already captured the lead. 🚀 Use A-Leads to find and close them before anyone else does.

📞 Start with 50 Verified Credits → a-leads.co

8. Seamless.AI

Score: 3.8/5 ⭐ Quick Reason: Popular with LinkedIn-first reps due to affordability and ease of use — but delivers shaky data quality, high bounce rates, and lacks real AI-driven enrichment.

Why Seamless.AI Made the List

Seamless.AI grew fast by pitching itself as a “ZoomInfo alternative without the $30K bill.” Its Chrome plugin lets reps pull contact details (emails and phones) straight from LinkedIn or company sites, making it an appealing option for solopreneurs or scrappy SDRs.

It markets hard on affordability and ease — and for some basic use cases, it delivers: cheap data access, no annual contracts, and a searchable web platform. But under the surface, it’s plagued by:

• ⚠️ Unverified contact data
• 🚫 High bounce rates
• 🛑 Hard-to-cancel subscriptions
• ❌ No built-in intent, job signals, or CRM-ready enrichment

For any sales team running real campaigns, Seamless can become a liability. You’ll burn credits on invalid emails, waste time cleaning lists, and end up layering it with other tools just to fix what it missed.

🔑 Core Features

• 🔎 Chrome Extension — pull contact data while browsing LinkedIn
• 📥 Basic Prospecting UI — search leads by title, company, industry
• 📄 List Builder — group contacts by criteria and export manually
• 🔌 Manual Integrations — CSV download or Zapier workaround for CRM
• 💡 Pitch — “Unlimited Leads” (with caveats)

🔻 Cons

• 🚫 No real-time verification — bounce rates often 20%+
• 🚫 Phone numbers frequently outdated or missing
• 🚫 No technographics, firmographics, or intent signals
• 🚫 No mobile number coverage in most plans
• 🚫 No AI-based filters or job change intelligence
• 🚫 Poor support + billing issues widely reported
• 🚫 Not built for scaling outbound campaigns

📌 Seamless.AI in Action

• Used by entry-level SDRs doing manual prospecting
• Common among LinkedIn-only workflows
• Not suitable for GTM orchestration, enrichment, or automation
• Often a stop-gap tool for teams still vetting real solutions

🧠Why A-Leads Crushes Seamless.AI for Outbound Teams

Seamless gives you emails. A-Leads gives you pipeline.
Where Seamless cuts corners, A-Leads delivers full-funnel value:

• Real-Time Verification
  • Seamless.AI: ❌
  • A-Leads: ✅
• Intent Signals
  • Seamless.AI: ❌
  • A-Leads: ✅ Built-in (Bombora + AI)
• Mobile Phone Access
  • Seamless.AI: ⚠️ Limited
  • A-Leads: ✅ Verified & included
• CRM Integrations
  • Seamless.AI: ⚠️ Manual only
  • A-Leads: ✅ Native with HubSpot, Salesforce, Outreach, Zoho, etc.
• Job Change Filters
  • Seamless.AI: ❌
  • A-Leads: ✅ Included
• Pay-Per-Valid-Lead
  • Seamless.AI: ❌
  • A-Leads: ✅ Only pay when it works

📉 Seamless is for scraping.

🚀 A-Leads is for closing.

👉 Start with 50 Free Verified Credits → a-leads.co

9. UpLead

Score: 3.9/5 ⭐ Quick Reason: Clean UI and built-in email verification make it a great starter tool — but lack of AI, job signals, intent data, and CRM depth limit its role in modern outbound stacks.

Why UpLead Made the List

UpLead markets itself as a budget-friendly alternative to ZoomInfo, built for small sales teams that want basic access to verified email data. It’s easy to navigate, features a decent-sized B2B contact pool, and — unlike many cheaper tools — includes real-time email verification at the moment of export.

That makes it a better option than tools like Seamless or Lusha for reducing bounce risk.

But UpLead’s simplicity is also its biggest limitation. There are no job change signals, no mobile numbers at scale, no technographic or intent data, and no intelligent enrichment. It’s just a nice UI over a filtered database.

If your team is growing or running multichannel outbound, UpLead will quickly get left behind.

🔑 Core Features

• 📇 Email Verification Engine — removes bounces before export
• 🧭 Simple Lead Filtering — by job title, industry, revenue, location
• 📤 CRM Sync (Limited) — works with HubSpot, Salesforce, Zoho
• 📊 Flat Pricing Tiers — no hidden fees or enforced contracts
• 🧰 CSV & Zapier Support — for light integrations
• 📈 Great for Startups — quick to onboard and train

🔻 Cons

• 🚫 No intent data, hiring signals, or job change tracking
• 🚫 No technographic filters — can’t segment by tools/stack
• 🚫 Minimal phone coverage — very few mobile numbers
• 🚫 No AI signals or dynamic data
• 🚫 No real CRM automation — mostly CSV-based workflows
• 🚫 Flat pricing model — no “pay-per-valid-lead” option
• 🚫 No scoring, tagging, or enrichment workflows

📌 UpLead in Action

• Great for very small teams or early GTM programs
• Common among budget-conscious agencies or solo reps
• Not scalable for multi-rep teams or automated outbound
• Good step up from scraping tools, but not a long-term core stack

🧠 Why A-Leads Dominates UpLead in 2025

UpLead gives you clean contacts — A-Leads gives you verified buyers
with real-time intent, job moves, and enriched profiles.

• Real-Time Verification
  • UpLead: ✅
  • A-Leads: ✅
• Buying Intent + Signals
  • UpLead: ❌
  • A-Leads: ✅ Bombora + AI-powered
• Job Change Filters
  • UpLead: ❌
  • A-Leads: ✅ Included
• Mobile Number Access
  • UpLead: ⚠️ Low
  • A-Leads: ✅ High-quality, verified
• CRM + Sales Tool Sync
  • UpLead: ⚠️ CSV/Zapier only
  • A-Leads: ✅ Native to 10+ platforms (HubSpot, Salesforce, Clay, Zoho, etc.)
• Technographics
  • UpLead: ❌
  • A-Leads: ✅ Deep filters built-in
• Pay-Per-Valid-Lead
  • UpLead: ❌ Flat license
  • A-Leads: ✅ Only pay when usable

🟠 UpLead is a good intro tool.

🔥 A-Leads is the last one you’ll need.

👉 Start with 50 Verified Leads Free → a-leads.co

10. LeadIQ

Score: 3.8/5 ⭐ Quick Reason: A clean Chrome plugin for scraping emails from LinkedIn — but lacks real-time validation, data depth, AI filters, and delivers poor ROI at scale.

Why LeadIQ Made the List

LeadIQ is often the first tool that new SDRs use when starting LinkedIn-based outreach. Its Chrome extension is snappy, it pulls emails and phone numbers from LinkedIn profiles, and it syncs with tools like SalesLoft and Outreach.

It’s convenient for 1:1 sourcing.

But beyond that — things get shaky. The platform offers no data intelligence, no AI scoring, no firmographics, and very little enrichment. Email deliverability is often hit-or-miss, and you can’t customize filters the way you can in serious platforms.

Worse, most features are gated behind expensive contracts with no credit rollover, no usage-based pricing, and no refund for invalid data.

🔑 Core Features

• 🔎 Chrome Extension for LinkedIn — scrape emails/phones in real time
• 📤 Push to Sequences — native support for Outreach & SalesLoft
• 🔁 Prospecting Assistant — reminders, contact status, touchpoint tracking
• 📊 Light Enrichment — auto-fills role and company info for scraped leads
• 🗂️ Team Collaboration — assign leads, share notes

🔻 Cons

• 🚫 No real-time verification — bounce risk is high
• 🚫 No technographics, job changes, or hiring signals
• 🚫 No CRM sync without third-party tools
• 🚫 No credit refunds or rollovers — you eat the cost
• 🚫 Gated features = pay more to do basic things
• 🚫 Can’t run campaigns — not built for volume GTM
• 🚫 Lacks AI enrichment, scoring, or prioritization

📌 LeadIQ in Action

• Used for manual 1:1 LinkedIn prospecting
• Common among early SDRs or small teams
• Best as a supplement to smarter tools
• Not suitable for automation, intent-based GTM, or scaling ops

🧠Why A-Leads Wins by a Landslide

LeadIQ is good at scraping. A-Leads is great at scaling.

• LinkedIn Scraping
  • LeadIQ: ✅ Chrome plugin
  • A-Leads: ✅ Chrome + API-based filters
• AI Signals & Intent Data
  • LeadIQ: ❌ None
  • A-Leads: ✅ Built-in + Bombora-powered
• CRM & SEP Integrations
  • LeadIQ: ⚠️ Limited
  • A-Leads: ✅ Full-stack sync (Salesforce, HubSpot, Clay, Zoho, Smartlead…)
• Job Change Filters
  • LeadIQ: ❌ Not supported
  • A-Leads: ✅ Native in all plans
• Real-Time Data Verification
  • LeadIQ: ❌ Not available
  • A-Leads: ✅ 99%+ deliverability
• Pay Only for Valid Data
  • LeadIQ: ❌ Flat fee
  • A-Leads: ✅ Performance-based pricing
• Data Enrichment + Scoring
  • LeadIQ: ❌ Missing
  • A-Leads: ✅ Real-time, automated

📌 LeadIQ helps you click “connect.”

🚀 A-Leads helps you close deals.

👉 Try A-Leads now with 50 verified leads → a-leads.co